No one speaks to your engineers
The technical case for a claim is written best by someone who has talked to the people who did the work. A claim prepared entirely from documents or from the finance team is easier to get wrong.
A red flag is a reason to ask more questions. It does not mean an adviser has done anything wrong. This page describes a practice in general terms and is not about any particular firm.
When it is a problem
- The technical descriptions are written from a questionnaire or from finance records, and the people who did the work have never been asked about it.
- The claim covers complex or unusual work that a description from documents cannot capture.
- Your technical staff read the claim, if they see it at all, and do not recognise the work in it.
- A review would be answered by people who cannot explain the work, because nobody who understood it was involved in the claim.
When it is not a problem
- Your technical lead wrote the descriptions, and the adviser's role is the tax treatment and the numbers.
- The claim is small and repeats last year's, when the interviews were done, and nothing has changed.
- The adviser interviewed the people who did the work in a previous year and has checked with them that the work is the same.
- Your business is small enough that the owner is the engineer, and the adviser has spent the time with them.
What to do
- Ask who will write the technical case and who they will talk to.
- Ask for time in the process for your technical staff to be interviewed and to read the result.
- Before filing, ask the people who did the work to read the descriptions and say whether they are true.
- Keep a record of those conversations; they are what a review will ask about.
Read next
KnowYourFees.org is published by Swanson Reed, an R&D tax advisory firm that competes with other advisers. This site does not recommend any adviser, including Swanson Reed.
© 2026 Swanson Reed. You may use the templates and checklists for your own business. Official material is used under the terms set by its publisher.

